<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Esemplastic thermoplastic &#187; biology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drzubkov.com/topics/science/biology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drzubkov.com</link>
	<description>chemists are reactive scientists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>May 2010 in science</title>
		<link>http://drzubkov.com/2010/06/may-2010-in-science/</link>
		<comments>http://drzubkov.com/2010/06/may-2010-in-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 05:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cubbi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drzubkov.com/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest news was of course &#8220;Scientists Create Life!!!&#8221; &#8212; the group that has been tediously working on Mycoplasma which, back when they began, was known as the bacterium with the smallest genome (now we know about Pelagibacter ubique, which is so much more awesome in many ways) finally did it, they fully synthesized its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest news was of course &#8220;Scientists Create Life!!!&#8221; &#8212; the group that has been tediously working on Mycoplasma which, back when they began, was known as the bacterium with the smallest genome (now we know about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagibacter%20ubique">Pelagibacter ubique</a>, which is so much more awesome in many ways) finally did it, they <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719">fully synthesized its entire genome</a> from scratch, with some modifications, and &#8220;booted&#8221; it in a different bacteria which then died to produce their new cell.</p>
<p>In a do-over after their <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05336">2006 failure</a>, Neanderthal genome <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1188021">was finally sequenced</a> (60% of it) and confirmed that it wasn&#8217;t all war when modern humans left Africa, there was some interbreeding going on too, which made us all 1% &#8211; 4% Neanderthal. Although the important implications were the identification of the 78 genes that separate us &#8211; most of them already known as genes that deal with human brain because mutations in them cause everything from Down&#8217;s (DYRK1A) to Autism disorders (CADPS2 and AUTS2). Too bad we&#8217;re not allowed to mod a human germ cell and grow up a Neanderthal child in a test tube.</p>
<p>In another example of prehistoric genetics, a wooly mammoth gene was inserted in E.coli to express mammoth hemoglobin and to study how does it work at low temperatures. I just love how the first sentence of the article&#8217;s abstract says <a href="http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v42/n6/abs/ng.574.html">&#8220;We have successfully resurrected &#8230;&#8221;</a></p>
<p>To the joy of quacks everywhere, acupuncture was meticulously studied and <a href="http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nn.2562.html">proven to relieve pain in mice</a> (as long as the mice don&#8217;t have the mutation that removes their adenosine receptors). Of course you don&#8217;t have to know anything about magical energies, it&#8217;s the tissue damage that releases the pain-killing chemical.</p>
<p>Speaking of researching the antiscientific, a three year long study showed that both lab and wild birds <a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123446916/abstract">prefer conventionally-grown grain to &#8220;organic&#8221; grain</a> because of its higher nutritional content (but it takes them a while to learn the difference). Not a surprise to me, I never buy &#8220;organic&#8221; food myself anyway, but the authors just had to say they are overturning a &#8220;dogma&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oh and while I&#8217;m on quakery subject, Wakefield&#8217;s old papers about his made-up vaccination-autism connection <a href="http://www.nature.com/ajg/journal/v105/n5/full/ajg2010149a.html">were retracted from public record</a> by The Lancet and American Journal of Gastroenterology &#8212; about time!</p>
<p>Since it&#8217;s all about biology today, a couple biologists from New Hampshire played <strike>God</strike> Nature by changing whole-island populations of predators and lizards on six tiny Caribbean islands and <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09020">evolved some tough anole lizards</a> in a field experiment on natural selection. </p>
<p>Also, apparently we can now reprogram the poor abused E.coli <a href="http://www.nature.com/nchembio/journal/v6/n6/abs/nchembio.369.html">to seek and destroy specific chemicals</a>, in this case, a herbicide.</p>
<p>And for a quick round-up of the bizarre, <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050131/full/news050131-5.html">Monkeys pay for porn</a>,  2-toed sloths <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.mambio.2010.03.003">hide in outhouses to eat our poop</a>, and there&#8217;s a <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/dot-shot-sinkhole-in-guatemala-city/">new gaping hole in the middle of Guatemala city</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for May. Enjoy the <a href="http://illusioncontest.neuralcorrelate.com/2010/impossible-motion-magnet-like-slopes/">World&#8217;s Best Visual Illusion</a> of 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drzubkov.com/2010/06/may-2010-in-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fruit bats and their tongues</title>
		<link>http://drzubkov.com/2009/11/fruit-bats-and-their-tongues/</link>
		<comments>http://drzubkov.com/2009/11/fruit-bats-and-their-tongues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cubbi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drzubkov.com/?p=970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#8217;s two weeks old, but it&#8217;s still amusing. To quote the article, &#8220;Our observations are the first to show regular fellatio in adult animals other than humans.&#8221; What I find really funny though is how unrealistically precise they were with their timing. Duration of copulation measured to one hundredth of a second? Really? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007595"><img alt="Fruit bat fellatio" src="http://cubbi.org/tmp/lj/bat_oral.jpg" title="Fruit bat fellatio" width="300" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tan M, et al. (2009) Fellatio by Fruit Bats Prolongs Copulation Time. PLoS ONE 4(10): e7595</p></div><br />
I know it&#8217;s two weeks old, but it&#8217;s still amusing. To quote <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007595">the article</a>, <em>&#8220;Our observations are the first to show regular fellatio in adult animals other than humans.&#8221;</em><br />
<br />
What I find really funny though is how unrealistically precise they were with their timing. Duration of copulation measured to one hundredth of a second? Really? With precision of give or take half a minute?<br />
<br />
<em>&#8220;The average duration of penis licking was 19.14±3.45 s, representing about 8.7% of the average duration of copulation (220.29±26.19 s (N = 14)). [...] The pairs spent more time copulating if the female licked her mate&#8217;s penis [...] than on occasions when females did not show licking behavior (121.83±20.56 s, N = 6)&#8221;</em><br />
<br />
Well, I guess that&#8217;s PLoS ONE for you.<br />
<small>Crossposted from <a href="http://cubbi.livejournal.com/70355.html">LiveJournal</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drzubkov.com/2009/11/fruit-bats-and-their-tongues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even when the media is pro-science, it does it disservice.</title>
		<link>http://drzubkov.com/2009/05/even-when-the-media-is-pro-science-it-does-it-disservice/</link>
		<comments>http://drzubkov.com/2009/05/even-when-the-media-is-pro-science-it-does-it-disservice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cubbi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drzubkov.com/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the news say: Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution &#8230; Researchers say proof of this transitional species finally confirms Charles Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution, and the then radical, outlandish ideas he came up with during his time aboard the Beagle. What the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 207px"><img alt="Fig. 1A of the PLoS ONE article, published under the Creative Commons Attribution License" src="http://cubbi.org/tmp/lj/fossil3.jpg" title="Darwinius masillae" width="197" height="299" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Fig. 1A of the PLoS ONE article, published under the Creative Commons Attribution License</p></div>What the <a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Missing-Link-Scientists-In-New-York-Unveil-Fossil-Of-Lemur-Monkey-Hailed-As-Mans-Earliest-Ancestor/Article/200905315284582">news say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Scientists have unveiled a 47-million-year-old fossilised skeleton of a monkey hailed as the missing link in human evolution &#8230; Researchers say proof of this transitional species finally confirms Charles Darwin&#8217;s theory of evolution, and the then radical, outlandish ideas he came up with during his time aboard the Beagle.</p></blockquote>
<p>What the researchers <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0005723">actually say</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Morphological characteristics preserved in Darwinius masillae enable a rigorous comparison with the two principal subdivisions of living primates: Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini. Defining characters of Darwinius ally it with early haplorhines rather than strepsirrhines. We do not interpret Darwinius as anthropoid, but the adapoid primates it represents deserve more careful comparison with higher primates than they have received in the past.</p></blockquote>
<p>upd: looks like the researchers may have <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2009/05/poor_poor_ida_or_overselling_a.php">hyped it up themselves</a>, off-paper. Way to lose face.<br />
<small>Crossposted from <a href="http://cubbi.livejournal.com/66328.html">Livejournal</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drzubkov.com/2009/05/even-when-the-media-is-pro-science-it-does-it-disservice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Darwin Day</title>
		<link>http://drzubkov.com/2009/02/happy-darwin-day/</link>
		<comments>http://drzubkov.com/2009/02/happy-darwin-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cubbi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drzubkov.com/?p=638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So today is the 200th anniversary of Darwin, the British naturalist who first created a detailed, rigorous, and lucid account of then emerging theory of common descent and natural selection, which provided a solid explanation for the facts of biological evolution that were known back then and managed to correctly predict thousands of the future [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So today is the 200th anniversary of Darwin, the British naturalist who first created a detailed, rigorous, and lucid account of then emerging theory of common descent and natural selection, which provided a solid explanation for the facts of biological evolution that were known back then and managed to correctly predict thousands of the future observations. Although nearly everything we know about evolution today did not come from Darwin, and he&#8217;d never understand a word in a modern research paper, his work is the underlying basis of modern biology much like Newton&#8217;s laws of motion are the basis of modern physics.</p>
<p>And yet I live in the only non-islamic country in the world where the nutcases who think that all of the modern biology is wrong are not a ridiculous minority, but comprise nearly 40-60% of general population <small>(<a href="http://richarddawkins.net/article,706,Public-Acceptance-of-Evolution,Science-Magazine-Jon-D-Miller-Eugenie-C-Scott-Shinji-Okamoto">Miller et al. (2006) Science 313:765-766 say 40-45%, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pew/20090212/ts_pew/63rejectdarwinstheoryofevolution">Pew Research Center says 63%</a>)</small>. Their leaders and spokesmen not just make stuff up and pass it as some sort of secret truth, they publish books, make movies, built museums, and continually attempt to force the schools to teach their lies. Major league politicians and celebrities openly confess their ignorance. If you run into a creationist, an IDer, or one of their ilk online, make sure to have <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/">http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/</a> open in your browser, because their claims are almost never original, and have been debunked before.</p>
<p>As for some cool recent discoveries, check out the <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/loom/2007/12/19/whales_from_so_humble_a_beginn.php">early</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004366">later</a> whale ancestors or the <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/11/odontochelys_a_transitional_tu.php">turtle</a> ancestor, or the new work on the <a href="http://cubbi.org/tmp/lj/PNAS-2008-Eckhart-18419-23.pdf">evolution of hair</a>.</p>
<p><small>Crossposted from <a href="http://cubbi.livejournal.com/63015.html">LiveJournal</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drzubkov.com/2009/02/happy-darwin-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
